CQCOMPETITIVE
INTELLIGENCE
Research prototype
← Global soccer catalog

GLOBAL SOCCER / ROSTER SLOT 02 / WAVE 1

Lamine Yamal

—Official CQ
Scoring in progress — no official CQ published.

Selection rank 2 · 2025 men's Ballon d'Or final voting

Roster updated: September 27, 2026 ↗
Portrait of Lamine Yamal

Portrait: FC Barcelona ↗

THE SELECTION CASE

Why Lamine Yamal?

Lamine Yamal holds selection position 2 in our dated 2025 men's Ballon d'Or final voting record, with 1,059 voting points. That places this athlete inside the five selected from this source; it does not convert award votes into CQ points.

Selection source · 2025-09-22 ↗

THE CQ CASE / EDITORIAL REVIEW HYPOTHESIS

Choosing when to take on a defender

These are the qualities to test before this athlete can earn a CQ ranking.

Choose well 16%Adjust 12%

What would support the case

Review Yamal's choice between an individual take-on and a pass when a second defender arrives.

What could weaken it

Include possessions where the first option is closed; successful dribbles alone cannot demonstrate adaptability.

How this becomes a score

The percentages above are model weights, not athlete ratings. Reviewers rate observed behavior from 0–4 using approved sport-specific anchors. CQ combines all eight qualified dimensions on a 0–100 scale. No points are assigned for fame, award votes or this editorial case.

Each dimension requires at least three qualified ratings, two distinct evidence units and two independent reviewers, within a declared review window. All eight must qualify before an overall score can be released. Preparation, learning and influence need direct evidence; they cannot be filled from match outcomes.

See the eight weights and calculation ↗

Status: hypothesis only · 0 qualified dimensions · no official CQ published. Historical examples are research leads; they count only if eligible in the declared review window.

Model CQ v1.1Review window Not scheduledConfidence Not assessedSport manual Not approved

Eight dimensions. Inspect the evidence.

Each dimension needs three qualified ratings, two independent reviewers, and two distinct evidence units.

EVIDENCE BEHIND THE SCORE

No evidence published yet.

Observable unit: Possession / phase. Authorized public sources will appear with publisher, event date, timestamp, behavioral caption, and access status.

How scores are earned ↗

TARGET ATTAINMENT

Target attainment - how close to this profile's ranges, not a personality type

Unavailable until all eight dimensions qualify and profile ranges are approved.

Review history

No released assessment. No comparable cycle or score movement exists.

Audit details

Manifest: not frozen
Release: not published
Selection snapshot: CQ-ROSTER-2026-09-27-R2; operational eligibility pending
Corrections: no released history

Explore the trading sandbox.

Practice buying and selling virtual athlete units using clearly labeled scripted signals. Official athlete assessments remain pending.

Open practice trading

Paper points only. No cash, prizes, purchase, transfer, or redemption.